Medical negligence law in the UK has developed over the last century as a branch of the general law of negligence which also relates to personal injury compensation claims, most frequently as a result of accidents caused by negligence predominantly motor vehicle collisions. Medical negligence law, whilst having its roots in the general law of negligence, is now a distinct topic with much relevant case law, specific legislation and a unique protocol in the UK courts. Medical negligence compensations claims usually arise as a result of failed treatment, misdiagnosis or late diagnosis.
A popular misconception regarding medical negligence law is that compensation can be claimed merely because treatment didnt work, which is in fact a very long way from the truth. The mere fact that the treatment was ineffective does not necessarily give rise to a medical negligence compensation claim nor does the fact that another alternative treatment may have worked. In order to be able to make a successful claim for damages following failed medical treatment it is necessary to establish 'negligence' which in its simplest terms means that the treating physician failed to reach a reasonable standard of care. Medical negligence law dictates that the following three issues must be satisfied in order to prove negligence :-
Medical negligence law dictates that a patient must always consent to clinical procedures under what is known as the 'doctrine of Informed Consent'. A healthcare practitioner should fully advise the patient of the proposed treatment and its effects including known risk factors. Patients should also be told about alternative treatments that are available and should make a decision in regards to medical treatment after being made fully aware of all of the facts. Failure to do so on the part of a healthcare practitioner is negligence and can also lead to serious charges of 'battery' if consent is withheld but the treatment is carried out in any event without agreement from the patient.
Our medical negligence solicitors offer a no-win no-fee system, and in appropriate cases use legal aid to help you pursue a compensation claim. Our firm's civil litigation solicitors are experts in the field of medical negligence law, and are members of the Solicitors' Regulation Authority Panel of Clinical Negligence Experts. If you believe that you have a potential negligence claim, then we encourage you to get free legal advice from one of our experienced medical negligence solicitors who specialises in the subject. You can do this either via the helpline or you can email our offices. There is no obligation or charge if you do not wish to proceed.
Fortunately, it is still possible to receive legal aid to cover your solicitor's costs, if you want to make a case for compensation for a clinical error, which normally involves taking the case to court. Eligibility is limited to adults over 18 years of age who either have a low annual income, or who are in receipt of certain government benefits. The rules for children under 18 are different, and they are generally accepted for legal aid assistance, unless they have a substantial amount of money in their own name. Parental income is not considered in the assessment of means.
CFAs (Conditional Fee Agreements), commonly referred to as no win no fee* arrangements, are the norm for a large percentage of civil legal cases which pursue various forms of medical negligence. CFAs are not all the same and vary according to the financial agreement between the solicitor and the client. Some lawyers specialising in medical negligence require upfront funds to cover basic expenditure such as court fees and medical reports however our medical negligence solicitors do not ask for any funds on account to cover their charges for legal work.
Awards are in line with the law on medical negligence, and the compensatory sum is dependent on various factors such as: long-term disability, the degree of the injury, and the recovery time. There are two main categories pertaining to a claim: special damages, and general damages. The former applies to: expenses that have been charged to date, a loss of earnings, and the cost of care. Conversely, the latter comprises remuneration for less tangible things such as suffering and pain.
The purpose of medical negligence compensation is to place the injured person back into the position that they would have been had the negligent act not taken place. Sounds fine, but how do you compensate someone on a purely financial basis for the loss of a loved one or for a serious personal injury such as blindness or limb amputation. The concept of financial compensation has serious limitations however there is not really any other alternative and the courts in Ireland handle the issue as best they can by looking backwards to see how others in a similar position were treated by the courts in the past with an inflationary upgrade to modernise the award.
Judges do their best to calculate medical negligence compensation however the one item that is very difficult is estimation of damages for 'pain and suffering'. After liability is established a judge will ask for representations from both parties lawyers in regards to their estimates of the amount that should be awarded as damages including sums for pain and suffering. A judge will make a final decision and award damages based on the lawyers representations, his own experience, authoritative literature and government guidelines but most importantly based on the decisions made by judges in previously decided similar cases.
Lawyers separate different classes of compensation as follows :-